**Description:**
This PR adds a check for filename title and if the title ends with
`.pdf` then the extension isnt added or else its added
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Bug Fixes**
- Enhanced email attachment handling to ensure PDF files are correctly
identified with a ".pdf" extension.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Updated the email content based on whether the document owner is a
recipient or not.
If the document owner is a recipient (self-signer):
* the email subject will be `Please view/sign/approve your document`
* the email header will be `Please view/sign/approve your document
"<your-doc-title>"`
* the email content will be `You have initiated the document
"<your-doc-title>" that requires you to view/sign/approve it.`
Otherwise:
* the email subject will be `Please view/sign/approve this document`
* the email header will be `<doc-owner> has invited you to
view/sign/approve "<doc-title>"`
* the email content will be `<doc-owner> has invited you to
view/sign/approve the document "<doc-title>".`
## Related Issue
Related to #1091
## Testing Performed
Tested the feature with a different number of recipients (including and
excluding the document owner - self-signer). Tested both the sending and
resending functionality.
## Checklist
- [x] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [x] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
## UI Screenshots
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced the document invitation components to support scenarios where
the recipient is also the sender, providing customized email content and
subject lines.
- Introduced new properties in email templates to improve clarity and
relevance based on the user's role in the document signing process.
- **Refactor**
- Updated components to use a more flexible `headerContent` property for
displaying invitation headers, replacing previous individual inviter
details.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Currently users can sign and complete draft documents, which will result
in a completed document in an invalid state.
## Changes Made
- Prevent recipients from inserting or uninserting fields for draft
documents
- Prevent recipients from completing draft documents
- Remove ability to copy signing tokens unless document is pending
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced document status visibility and control across various
components in the application. Users can now see and interact with
document statuses more dynamically in views like `DocumentPageView`,
`DocumentEditPageView`, and `DocumentsDataTable`.
- Improved document signing process with updated status checks, ensuring
actions like signing, completing, and removing fields are only available
under appropriate document statuses.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Adjusted document status validation logic in server-side operations to
prevent actions on incorrectly stated documents, enhancing the overall
security and functionality of document processing.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
The searchDocuments function is used for the shortcuts commands, afaik.
The function returns the documents that match the user query (if any),
alongside all their recipients.
The reason for that is so it can build the path for the document. E.g.
if you're the document owner, the document path will be
`..../documents/{id}`. But if you're a signer for example, the document
path (link) will be `..../sign/{token}`.
So instead of doing that on the frontend, I moved it to the backend.
At least that's what I understood. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced the `CommandMenu` component to simplify search result
generation and improve document link management based on user roles.
- **Refactor**
- Updated document search logic to include recipient token masking and
refined document mapping.
- **Style**
- Minor formatting improvement in document routing code.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Adds the ability to prefill native PDF form fields via the API using
either normal documents or templates.
Since we won't always know when a document is uploaded and has forms we
opt to do this on creation for templates and on sending the document to
recipients in all cases. This means that for a created document it can
look a little funky since the form fields are missing the data until the
document is sent.
This should be improved in a later change but since we've scoped this to
an API only workflow for now we are less concerned with the visual
issues.
## Related Issue
N/A
## Changes Made
- Added the `formValues` field the document model
- Added a new method for finding and filling form fields based on a `key
| value` pair
- Updated the API input shapes to take the new field.
## Testing Performed
- Have created and tested a document using the API both for creation and
usage with a template.
- Have verified that the fields display as expected either during
creation or sending depending on the document type.
## Description
Fetch the updated version of the document after sealing it and return
it. Previously, the `document.documentData.data` wasn't up to date. Now
it is.
## Related Issue
Fixes#1088.
## Testing Performed
* Added console.logs in the code to make sure it returns the proper data
* Set up a webhook and tested that the webhook receives the updated data
## Checklist
<!--- Please check the boxes that apply to this pull request. -->
<!--- You can add or remove items as needed. -->
- [x] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [x] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
## Description
Fixed issue where accounts that were initially created via
email/password, then linked to an SSO account, can bypass the 2FA during
login if they use their email password.
## Testing Performed
Tested locally, and 2FA is now required for linked SSO accounts
## Description
Add the following document action auth options:
- 2FA
- Passkey
If the user does not have the required auth setup, we onboard them
directly.
## Changes made
Note: Added secondaryId to the VerificationToken schema
## Testing Performed
Tested locally, pending preview tests
## Checklist
- [X] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [X] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [X] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced components for 2FA, account, and passkey authentication
during document signing.
- Added "Require passkey" option to document settings and signer
authentication settings.
- Enhanced form submission and loading states for improved user
experience.
- **Refactor**
- Optimized authentication components to efficiently support multiple
authentication methods.
- **Chores**
- Updated and renamed functions and components for clarity and
consistency across the authentication system.
- Refined sorting options and database schema to support new
authentication features.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Adjusted SignInForm to verify browser support for WebAuthn before
proceeding.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Added a dialog button at the bottom of the admin/documents/[id] page
with confirmation popup.
Confirmation popup have validation for reason to input.
On confirmation document is deleted, and an email is triggred to the
owner of document with the reason stated.
Let me know if there is any more requirement or correction is needed in
this pr. :) #1020
## Description
**Fixes issues with mismatching state between document steps.**
For example, editing a recipient and proceeding to the next step may not
display the updated recipient. And going back will display the old
recipient instead of the updated values.
**This PR also improves mutation and query speeds by adding logic to
bypass query invalidation.**
```ts
export const trpc = createTRPCReact<AppRouter>({
unstable_overrides: {
useMutation: {
async onSuccess(opts) {
await opts.originalFn();
// This forces mutations to wait for all the queries on the page to reload, and in
// this case one of the queries is `searchDocument` for the command overlay, which
// on average takes ~500ms. This means that every single mutation must wait for this.
await opts.queryClient.invalidateQueries();
},
},
},
});
```
I've added workarounds to allow us to bypass things such as batching and
invalidating queries. But I think we should instead remove this and
update all the mutations where a query is required for a more optimised
system.
## Example benchmarks
Using stg-app vs this preview there's an average 50% speed increase
across mutations.
**Set signer step:**
Average old speed: ~1100ms
Average new speed: ~550ms
**Set recipient step:**
Average old speed: ~1200ms
Average new speed: ~600ms
**Set fields step:**
Average old speed: ~1200ms
Average new speed: ~600ms
## Related Issue
This will resolve#470
## Changes Made
- Added ability to skip batch queries
- Added a state to store the required document data.
- Refetch the data between steps if/when required
- Optimise mutations and queries
## Checklist
- [X] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [X] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Smith <me@lucasjamessmith.me>
## Description
Add support to login with passkeys.
Passkeys can be added via the user security settings page.
Note: Currently left out adding the type of authentication method for
the 'user security audit logs' because we're using the `signIn`
next-auth event which doesn't appear to provide the context. Will look
into it at another time.
## Changes Made
- Add passkeys to login
- Add passkeys feature flag
- Add page to manage passkeys
- Add audit logs relating to passkeys
- Updated prisma schema to support passkeys & anonymous verification
tokens
## Testing Performed
To be done.
MacOS:
- Safari ✅
- Chrome ✅
- Firefox ✅
Windows:
- Chrome [Untested]
- Firefox [Untested]
Linux:
- Chrome [Untested]
- Firefox [Untested]
iOS:
- Safari ✅
## Checklist
<!--- Please check the boxes that apply to this pull request. -->
<!--- You can add or remove items as needed. -->
- [X] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced Passkey authentication, including creation, sign-in, and
management of passkeys.
- Added a Passkeys section in Security Settings for managing user
passkeys.
- Implemented UI updates for Passkey authentication, including a new
dialog for creating passkeys and a data table for managing them.
- Enhanced security settings with server-side feature flags to
conditionally display new security features.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved UI consistency in the Settings Security Activity Page.
- Updated button styling in the 2FA Recovery Codes component for better
visibility.
- **Refactor**
- Streamlined authentication options to include WebAuthn credentials
provider.
- **Chores**
- Updated database schema to support passkeys and related functionality.
- Added new audit log types for passkey-related activities.
- Enhanced server-only authentication utilities for passkey registration
and management.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Return the recipient as an array to match the other formats for Zapier.
Otherwise, Zaps with the "DOCUMENT_OPENED" hooks won't work.
All the other webhooks return the "Recipient" field as an array.
