The `typedSignatureEnabled` prop was removed from the `SignatureField`
component, which broke the typed signature meaning that nobody could
sign documents by typing their signature.
## Description
Introduces the ability for users with the **Assistant** role to prefill
fields on behalf of other signers. Assistants can fill in various field
types such as text, checkboxes, dates, and more, streamlining the
document preparation process before it reaches the final signers.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c1321578-47ec-405b-a70a-7d9578385895
## Description
Adds the ability to align text to the left, center or right for relevant
fields.
Previously text was always centered which can be less desirable.
See attached debug document which has left, center and right text
alignments set for fields.
<img width="614" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/361a030e-813d-458b-9c7a-ff4c9fa5e33c"
/>
## Related Issue
N/A
## Changes Made
- Added text align option
- Update the insert in pdf method to support different alignments
- Added a debug mode to field insertion
## Testing Performed
- Ran manual tests using the debug mode
Checkboxes were previously styled super wonky due to
the usage of checkboxClassName which styled the checkbox
trigger.
This change reverts all that and leaves it with sensible defaults
across dark and light mode.
## Description
<!--- Describe the changes introduced by this pull request. -->
<!--- Explain what problem it solves or what feature/fix it adds. -->
## Related Issue
<!--- If this pull request is related to a specific issue, reference it
here using #issue_number. -->
<!--- For example, "Fixes #123" or "Addresses #456". -->
## Changes Made
<!--- Provide a summary of the changes made in this pull request. -->
<!--- Include any relevant technical details or architecture changes.
-->
- Change 1
- Change 2
- ...
## Testing Performed
<!--- Describe the testing that you have performed to validate these
changes. -->
<!--- Include information about test cases, testing environments, and
results. -->
- Tested feature X in scenario Y.
- Ran unit tests for component Z.
- Tested on browsers A, B, and C.
- ...
## Checklist
<!--- Please check the boxes that apply to this pull request. -->
<!--- You can add or remove items as needed. -->
- [ ] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [ ] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
## Additional Notes
<!--- Provide any additional context or notes for the reviewers. -->
<!--- This might include details about design decisions, potential
concerns, or anything else relevant. -->
## Description
Allows for smaller field sizing in addition to improving our styling
when displaying labels on smaller fields.
This is the minimum currently supported field size until we perform a
more extensive refactor of our current drag and drop system.
## Related Issue
Reported via support channels
## Changes Made
- Updated our minimum size constraints
- Attempted to add a general autosizing component for text and failed
- Updated styling in a bunch of places to use the css `clamp()` method
for dynamic sizing.
## Description
Adds a dialog that will display when a certain field threshold is
reached asking the user if they would like to sign non-critical fields
such as name, date, initials, and email with information that is already
available.
This has not been added to direct templates since we would often not
have all the pre-requisite knowledge since users are mostly anonymous.
Additionally, this has not been added to the embedding view since it may
detract from the experience for some.
Will not prompt the user if there is action authentication on the
document.
See the below demo:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/71739b5c-1323-4da9-89fd-a1145c9714d5
## Related Issue
#1281 (Older PR relating to the feature)
## Changes Made
- Added a new auto-sign dialog that will automatically trigger once
certain criteria is met.
## Testing Performed
- Tested that the dialog displays when the threshold is met
- Tested that the dialog is hidden when the threshold is not met
- Tested that the messaging during errors is correct
- Tested that the dialog does not display when 2FA or Passkeys are
required
## Description
Adds support for rejecting a given document informing the document
owner.
Flows for resolving a rejection don't currently exist so it's up to the
document owner to reach out to the recipient and work out a way to move
forward via a new document or offline agreement.
## Related Issue
## Changes Made
- Added new rejection properties to the recipient schema
- Added API endpoints to support rejection
- Added email templates for notifying the document owner and recipient
- Added a dialog on the signing page to start the rejection flow.
## Testing Performed
- Manually tested the flow end to end
- Automated tests are planned
## Description
Support setting a document language that will control the language used
for sending emails to recipients. Additional work has been done to
convert all emails to using our i18n implementation so we can later add
controls for sending other kinds of emails in a users target language.
## Related Issue
N/A
## Changes Made
- Added `<Trans>` and `msg` macros to emails
- Introduced a new `renderEmailWithI18N` utility in the lib package
- Updated all emails to use the `<Tailwind>` component at the top level
due to rendering constraints
- Updated the `i18n.server.tsx` file to not use a top level await
## Testing Performed
- Configured document language and verified emails were sent in the
expected language
- Created a document from a template and verified that the templates
language was transferred to the document
Add the ability to insert typed signatures.
Once the signature field is placed on the document, a checkbox appears
in the document editor where the document owner can allow signers to add
typed signatures. Typed signatures are disabled by default.
Currently this won't always display super well since
our insertion solution isn't amazing but our current
minimum bounds within the UI are a bit large and can be
smaller.
This change makes it smaller and uses container queries to
support dynamically displaying labels based on the container
size.
Adds the ability to specify an optional signing order for documents.
When specified a document will be considered sequential with recipients
only being allowed to sign in the order that they were specified in.
When the Select field has a default value, it automatically signs with
it. If you change it, you need to refresh the page to re-sign again with
that value. This PR improves the UX by making the default value
"selectable" in the dropdown menu.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Updated the `DropdownField` component to simplify the handling of
default values, ensuring the dropdown starts without a pre-selected
option.
- Improved the clarity of the placeholder text in the dropdown,
enhancing user experience.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
When signing a document the final signer is often
greeted with a super long completing spinner since
we are synchronously signing the document and sending
emails to all recipients. This is frustrating and
has caused issues for customers and self-hosters.
Moving sealing to a background job resolves this
and improves the overall snappiness of the app while
also supporting retrying the sealing if it were to
fail in the future.
This has the implication of a document no longer
immediately being in a "completed" state once all
signers have signed. To assist with this we now
refetch the page every 5 seconds upon signing
completion until the document status as shifted to
completed.
When using account required auth for a given document
this change now shows the sign up or sign in button
depending on if an account actually exists within
Documenso.
This change should reduce friction and confusion when a
recipient has been invited to a document.
## Description
Direct templates links is a feature that provides template owners the
ability to allow users to create documents based of their templates.
## General outline
This works by allowing the template owner to configure a "direct
recipient" in the template.
When a user opens the direct link to the template, it will create a flow
where they sign the fields configured by the template owner for the
direct recipient. After these fields are signed the following will
occur:
- A document will be created where the owner is the template owner
- The direct recipient fields will be signed
- The document will be sent to any other recipients configured in the
template
- If there are none the document will be immediately completed
## Notes
There's a custom prisma migration to migrate all documents to have
'DOCUMENT' as the source, then sets the column to required.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Smith <me@lucasjamessmith.me>
## Description
Currently users can sign and complete draft documents, which will result
in a completed document in an invalid state.
## Changes Made
- Prevent recipients from inserting or uninserting fields for draft
documents
- Prevent recipients from completing draft documents
- Remove ability to copy signing tokens unless document is pending
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced document status visibility and control across various
components in the application. Users can now see and interact with
document statuses more dynamically in views like `DocumentPageView`,
`DocumentEditPageView`, and `DocumentsDataTable`.
- Improved document signing process with updated status checks, ensuring
actions like signing, completing, and removing fields are only available
under appropriate document statuses.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Adjusted document status validation logic in server-side operations to
prevent actions on incorrectly stated documents, enhancing the overall
security and functionality of document processing.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a "Claim Account" feature allowing new users to sign up by
providing their name, email, and password.
- Enhanced user experience for both logged-in and non-logged-in users
with improved UI/UX and additional functionality.
- **Enhancements**
- Implemented form validation and error handling for a smoother sign-up
process.
- Integrated analytics to track user actions during account claiming.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Smith <me@lucasjamessmith.me>
Co-authored-by: David Nguyen <davidngu28@gmail.com>
