Added a dialog button at the bottom of the admin/documents/[id] page
with confirmation popup.
Confirmation popup have validation for reason to input.
On confirmation document is deleted, and an email is triggred to the
owner of document with the reason stated.
Let me know if there is any more requirement or correction is needed in
this pr. :) #1020
## Description
**Fixes issues with mismatching state between document steps.**
For example, editing a recipient and proceeding to the next step may not
display the updated recipient. And going back will display the old
recipient instead of the updated values.
**This PR also improves mutation and query speeds by adding logic to
bypass query invalidation.**
```ts
export const trpc = createTRPCReact<AppRouter>({
unstable_overrides: {
useMutation: {
async onSuccess(opts) {
await opts.originalFn();
// This forces mutations to wait for all the queries on the page to reload, and in
// this case one of the queries is `searchDocument` for the command overlay, which
// on average takes ~500ms. This means that every single mutation must wait for this.
await opts.queryClient.invalidateQueries();
},
},
},
});
```
I've added workarounds to allow us to bypass things such as batching and
invalidating queries. But I think we should instead remove this and
update all the mutations where a query is required for a more optimised
system.
## Example benchmarks
Using stg-app vs this preview there's an average 50% speed increase
across mutations.
**Set signer step:**
Average old speed: ~1100ms
Average new speed: ~550ms
**Set recipient step:**
Average old speed: ~1200ms
Average new speed: ~600ms
**Set fields step:**
Average old speed: ~1200ms
Average new speed: ~600ms
## Related Issue
This will resolve#470
## Changes Made
- Added ability to skip batch queries
- Added a state to store the required document data.
- Refetch the data between steps if/when required
- Optimise mutations and queries
## Checklist
- [X] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [X] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Smith <me@lucasjamessmith.me>
## Description
Add support to login with passkeys.
Passkeys can be added via the user security settings page.
Note: Currently left out adding the type of authentication method for
the 'user security audit logs' because we're using the `signIn`
next-auth event which doesn't appear to provide the context. Will look
into it at another time.
## Changes Made
- Add passkeys to login
- Add passkeys feature flag
- Add page to manage passkeys
- Add audit logs relating to passkeys
- Updated prisma schema to support passkeys & anonymous verification
tokens
## Testing Performed
To be done.
MacOS:
- Safari ✅
- Chrome ✅
- Firefox ✅
Windows:
- Chrome [Untested]
- Firefox [Untested]
Linux:
- Chrome [Untested]
- Firefox [Untested]
iOS:
- Safari ✅
## Checklist
<!--- Please check the boxes that apply to this pull request. -->
<!--- You can add or remove items as needed. -->
- [X] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced Passkey authentication, including creation, sign-in, and
management of passkeys.
- Added a Passkeys section in Security Settings for managing user
passkeys.
- Implemented UI updates for Passkey authentication, including a new
dialog for creating passkeys and a data table for managing them.
- Enhanced security settings with server-side feature flags to
conditionally display new security features.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved UI consistency in the Settings Security Activity Page.
- Updated button styling in the 2FA Recovery Codes component for better
visibility.
- **Refactor**
- Streamlined authentication options to include WebAuthn credentials
provider.
- **Chores**
- Updated database schema to support passkeys and related functionality.
- Added new audit log types for passkey-related activities.
- Enhanced server-only authentication utilities for passkey registration
and management.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Return the recipient as an array to match the other formats for Zapier.
Otherwise, Zaps with the "DOCUMENT_OPENED" hooks won't work.
All the other webhooks return the "Recipient" field as an array.
