Adding a security.txt file enables security researchers to quickly and
easily see where they can submit security issues and know that they are
being taken serious. From the proposal website:
> "When security risks in web services are discovered by independent
security researchers who understand the severity of the risk, they often
lack the channels to disclose them properly. As a result, security
issues may be left unreported. security.txt defines a standard to help
organizations define the process for security researchers to disclose
security vulnerabilities securely.”
See also https://securitytxt.org
## Description
Currently we're not restricting team transfer and email verification
tokens from flowing into the frontend.
This changes restricts it to only return the required information
instead of the whole data object.
## Description
Currently the document redirect URL feature is preventing documents from
being created unless a redirect URL is provided.
During the document edit flow, the redirect URL is hidden in an advanced
tab with the value of an empty string, which will always fail the
current Zod validation since `optional` requires undefined to pass.
There are multiple ways to fix this, but I think this is the easiest
method where we can assume an empty string is valid.
## Description
Fixed issue where setting a recipient role as CC will prevent any
further changes as it is considered as "sent" and "signed".
## Other changes
- Prevent editing document after completed
- Removed CC and Viewers from the field recipient list since they will
never be filled
- Minor UI issues
## Checklist
- [X] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [X] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [X] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
## Description
Add the ability to feature flag the teams feature via UI.
Also added minor UI changes
## Checklist
- [X] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [X] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [X] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
## Description
Fixed issue where you are prevented from removing fields for a recipient
that has multiple fields.
Example:
Recipient has 3 fields, you remove 1 and proceed to next step. In the
next step the field reappears as it was not deleted.
## Checklist
- [X] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [X] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [X] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
