## Description
I added the option of downloading a document without the signing
certificate for teams. They can disable/enable the option in the
preferences tab.
The signing certificate can still be downloaded separately from the
`logs` page.
## Description
This PR introduces global settings for teams. At the moment, it allows
team admins to configure the following:
* The default visibility of the documents uploaded to the team account
* Whether to include the document owner (sender) details when sending
emails to the recipients.
### Include Sender Details
If the Sender Details setting is enabled, the emails sent by the team
will include the sender's name:
> "Example User" on behalf of "Example Team" has invited you to sign
"document.pdf"
Otherwise, the email will say:
> "Example Team" has invited you to sign "document.pdf"
### Default Document Visibility
This new option allows users to set the default visibility for the
documents uploaded to the team account. It can have the following
values:
* Everyone
* Manager and above
* Admins only
If the default document visibility isn't set, the document will be set
to the role of the user who created the document:
* If a user with the "User" role creates a document, the document's
visibility is set to "Everyone".
* Manager role -> "Manager and above"
* Admin role -> "Admins only"
Otherwise, if there is a default document visibility value, it uses that
value.
#### Gotcha
To avoid issues, the `document owner` and the `recipient` can access the
document irrespective of their role. For example:
* If a team member with the role "Member" uploads a document and the
default document visibility is "Admins", only the document owner and
admins can access the document.
* Similar to the other scenarios.
* If an admin uploads a document and the default document visibility is
"Admins", the recipient can access the document.
* The admins have access to all the documents.
* Managers have access to documents with the visibility set to
"Everyone" and "Manager and above"
* Members have access only to the documents with the visibility set to
"Everyone".
## Testing Performed
Tested it locally.
Add the ability to insert typed signatures.
Once the signature field is placed on the document, a checkbox appears
in the document editor where the document owner can allow signers to add
typed signatures. Typed signatures are disabled by default.
`later`
## Description
<!--- Describe the changes introduced by this pull request. -->
<!--- Explain what problem it solves or what feature/fix it adds. -->
## Related Issue
<!--- If this pull request is related to a specific issue, reference it
here using #issue_number. -->
<!--- For example, "Fixes #123" or "Addresses #456". -->
## Changes Made
<!--- Provide a summary of the changes made in this pull request. -->
<!--- Include any relevant technical details or architecture changes.
-->
- Change 1
- Change 2
- ...
## Testing Performed
<!--- Describe the testing that you have performed to validate these
changes. -->
<!--- Include information about test cases, testing environments, and
results. -->
- Tested feature X in scenario Y.
- Ran unit tests for component Z.
- Tested on browsers A, B, and C.
- ...
## Checklist
<!--- Please check the boxes that apply to this pull request. -->
<!--- You can add or remove items as needed. -->
- [ ] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [ ] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
## Additional Notes
<!--- Provide any additional context or notes for the reviewers. -->
<!--- This might include details about design decisions, potential
concerns, or anything else relevant. -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced comprehensive documentation for the Documenso public API.
- Added detailed guides for the following API endpoints:
- Uploading documents
- Generating documents from templates
- Adding fields to documents
- Included example payloads and response structures for better
understanding.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
A client requested it, and it makes sense showing the full count.
This is how it was before.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Updated document status tab counts to display actual numbers without
capping at 99 or using '+' symbols.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved clarity and accuracy of document status counts in the user
interface.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
It used the wrong property for finding the document's dateFormat in the
`DATE_FORMATS` array.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Improved date format selection in the settings form to ensure accurate
formatting based on value.
- Default timezone now automatically set to the user's local timezone
for better user experience.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Corrected initialization of the timezone field to enhance form
accuracy.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Templates can be created and sent with advanced fields that have empty
values. That will cause an error when the user tries to sign the
document.
For example, you can create a template with a checkbox field and save
it. Then, you can click the "Use template" button and send the document
by clicking "Send document." However, this shouldn't be possible if the
advanced field doesn't have any values.
When the Select field has a default value, it automatically signs with
it. If you change it, you need to refresh the page to re-sign again with
that value. This PR improves the UX by making the default value
"selectable" in the dropdown menu.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Updated the `DropdownField` component to simplify the handling of
default values, ensuring the dropdown starts without a pre-selected
option.
- Improved the clarity of the placeholder text in the dropdown,
enhancing user experience.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---
name: Pull Request
about: Submit changes to the project for review and inclusion
---
## Description
<!--- Describe the changes introduced by this pull request. -->
<!--- Explain what problem it solves or what feature/fix it adds. -->
## Related Issue
<!--- If this pull request is related to a specific issue, reference it
here using #issue_number. -->
<!--- For example, "Fixes #123" or "Addresses #456". -->
## Changes Made
<!--- Provide a summary of the changes made in this pull request. -->
<!--- Include any relevant technical details or architecture changes.
-->
- Change 1
- Change 2
- ...
## Testing Performed
<!--- Describe the testing that you have performed to validate these
changes. -->
<!--- Include information about test cases, testing environments, and
results. -->
- Tested feature X in scenario Y.
- Ran unit tests for component Z.
- Tested on browsers A, B, and C.
- ...
## Checklist
<!--- Please check the boxes that apply to this pull request. -->
<!--- You can add or remove items as needed. -->
- [ ] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [ ] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
## Additional Notes
<!--- Provide any additional context or notes for the reviewers. -->
<!--- This might include details about design decisions, potential
concerns, or anything else relevant. -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a new `CallToAction` component to enhance user engagement
in the self-hosting documentation.
- Added interactive call-to-action elements in the self-hosting
documentation pages to guide users towards specific actions.
- **Documentation**
- Updated self-hosting documentation to include the new call-to-action
feature, improving usability and interactivity.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Configure the advanced field via API.
## Checklist
<!--- Please check the boxes that apply to this pull request. -->
<!--- You can add or remove items as needed. -->
- [x] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [x] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [x] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced API functionality to support field metadata during field
creation.
- Introduced validation checks for field metadata to ensure necessary
information is provided for advanced field types.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved error handling during field creation to return properly
formatted error responses.
- **Documentation**
- Updated API schemas to include field metadata, enhancing data
validation and response structures.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Previously, it wasn't possible to download an audit log of a document
uploaded by another user because the function used the ID of the user
making the request to retrieve the document. However, the document
uploaded by another user has that user's ID, not the ID of the user
making the request.
Since we allow checkboxes and radio fields without a label (which we use for the value) we
had an issue where multiple checkboxes with no value would exist and items would not end
up checked on the resulting document.
This change fixes that by adding a placeholder value for these empty checkboxes and labels.
## Description
<!--- Describe the changes introduced by this pull request. -->
<!--- Explain what problem it solves or what feature/fix it adds. -->
## Related Issue
<!--- If this pull request is related to a specific issue, reference it
here using #issue_number. -->
<!--- For example, "Fixes #123" or "Addresses #456". -->
## Changes Made
<!--- Provide a summary of the changes made in this pull request. -->
<!--- Include any relevant technical details or architecture changes.
-->
- Change 1
- Change 2
- ...
## Testing Performed
<!--- Describe the testing that you have performed to validate these
changes. -->
<!--- Include information about test cases, testing environments, and
results. -->
- Tested feature X in scenario Y.
- Ran unit tests for component Z.
- Tested on browsers A, B, and C.
- ...
## Checklist
<!--- Please check the boxes that apply to this pull request. -->
<!--- You can add or remove items as needed. -->
- [ ] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [ ] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
## Additional Notes
<!--- Provide any additional context or notes for the reviewers. -->
<!--- This might include details about design decisions, potential
concerns, or anything else relevant. -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Documentation**
- Enhanced project README for clarity and improved environment variables
section.
- Added comprehensive developer and user documentation, including guides
on local development, public API, self-hosting, and compliance
standards.
- Introduced specific guides for contributing, creating API keys, using
webhooks, and setting up security measures.
- Detailed documentation on various fields available for document
signing to improve user understanding.
- Added metadata structuring to improve navigation within the
documentation site.
- **Chores**
- Updated `.gitignore` to better handle project files.
- **New Features**
- Introduced detailed metadata and documentation for various Documenso
functionalities, including signing documents, user profiles, and
compliance levels.
- Added functionality for Direct Link Signing, enabling easy sharing for
document signing.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Timur Ercan <timur.ercan31@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Smith <me@lucasjamessmith.me>
Co-authored-by: David Nguyen <davidngu28@gmail.com>
## Description
Show a dialog when the document has signers with no signature fields
placed.
## Changes Made
Created a new dialog that'll be triggered when the document owner tries
to send a document to the signers without placing signature fields. The
document owners can't proceed to the next step unless they add signature
fields.
## Checklist
- [x] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [x] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
https://github.com/documenso/documenso/assets/25515812/f1b5c34e-2ce0-40e3-804c-f05d23045710
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced "Direct Links" for async signing, allowing users to create
documents from templates using public links.
- Added `MissingSignatureFieldDialog` component to ensure users don't
miss adding signature fields.
- **Enhancements**
- Updated blog content to provide guidance on contract management and
announce new pricing plans.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved async signing process for better efficiency and control.
- **Refactor**
- Improved internal code structure and import order for stripe-related
functionality.
- **Tests**
- Enhanced e2e tests to verify signature presence before document
creation and updated test flows for document approval.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: David Nguyen <davidngu28@gmail.com>
## Description
Allow users to download a completed document via API.
## Testing Performed
Tested the code locally by trying to download both draft and completed
docs. Works as expected.
## Checklist
- [x] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [x] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Implemented functionality to download signed documents directly from
the app.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Updated the email content based on whether the document owner is a
recipient or not.
If the document owner is a recipient (self-signer):
* the email subject will be `Please view/sign/approve your document`
* the email header will be `Please view/sign/approve your document
"<your-doc-title>"`
* the email content will be `You have initiated the document
"<your-doc-title>" that requires you to view/sign/approve it.`
Otherwise:
* the email subject will be `Please view/sign/approve this document`
* the email header will be `<doc-owner> has invited you to
view/sign/approve "<doc-title>"`
* the email content will be `<doc-owner> has invited you to
view/sign/approve the document "<doc-title>".`
## Related Issue
Related to #1091
## Testing Performed
Tested the feature with a different number of recipients (including and
excluding the document owner - self-signer). Tested both the sending and
resending functionality.
## Checklist
- [x] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [x] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
## UI Screenshots
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced the document invitation components to support scenarios where
the recipient is also the sender, providing customized email content and
subject lines.
- Introduced new properties in email templates to improve clarity and
relevance based on the user's role in the document signing process.
- **Refactor**
- Updated components to use a more flexible `headerContent` property for
displaying invitation headers, replacing previous individual inviter
details.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description
Add additional information for each role to help document owners
understand what each role involves.
## Changes Made
## Testing Performed
Tested the changes locally.
## Checklist
<!--- Please check the boxes that apply to this pull request. -->
<!--- You can add or remove items as needed. -->
- [x] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [x] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Updated recipient role terminology and added tooltips in the
`AddSignersFormPartial` component:
- "Signer" changed to "Needs to sign" with tooltip
- "Receives copy" changed to "Needs to approve" with tooltip
- "Approver" changed to "Needs to view" with tooltip
- "Viewer" changed to "Receives copy" with tooltip
- Enhanced select dropdown options with icons and tooltips for different
recipient roles in the `AddTemplatePlaceholderRecipients` component.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Timur Ercan <timur.ercan31@gmail.com>
## Description
This PR introduces the ability to add oneself as a signer by simply
clicking a button, rather than filling the details manually.
### "Add Myself" in the document creation flow
https://github.com/documenso/documenso/assets/25515812/0de762e3-563a-491f-a742-9078bf1d627d
### "Add Myself" in the document template creation flow
https://github.com/documenso/documenso/assets/25515812/775bae01-3f5a-4b24-abbf-a47b14ec594a
## Related Issue
Addresses
[#113](https://github.com/documenso/backlog-internal/issues/113)
## Changes Made
Added a new button that grabs the details of the logged-in user and
fills the fields *(email, name, and role)* automatically when clicked.
## Testing Performed
Tested the changes locally through the UI.
## Checklist
- [x] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [x] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced the ability for users to add themselves as signers within
documents seamlessly.
- **Enhancements**
- Improved form handling logic to accommodate new self-signer
functionality.
- Enhanced user interface elements to support the addition of self as a
signer, including a new "Add myself" button and disabling input fields
during the process.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
The searchDocuments function is used for the shortcuts commands, afaik.
The function returns the documents that match the user query (if any),
alongside all their recipients.
The reason for that is so it can build the path for the document. E.g.
if you're the document owner, the document path will be
`..../documents/{id}`. But if you're a signer for example, the document
path (link) will be `..../sign/{token}`.
So instead of doing that on the frontend, I moved it to the backend.
At least that's what I understood. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Enhanced the `CommandMenu` component to simplify search result
generation and improve document link management based on user roles.
- **Refactor**
- Updated document search logic to include recipient token masking and
refined document mapping.
- **Style**
- Minor formatting improvement in document routing code.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Refactor**
- Enhanced the API specification generation process to include operation
IDs, security schemes, and security definitions more efficiently.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Smith <me@lucasjamessmith.me>
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **New Features**
- Introduced a "Claim Account" feature allowing new users to sign up by
providing their name, email, and password.
- Enhanced user experience for both logged-in and non-logged-in users
with improved UI/UX and additional functionality.
- **Enhancements**
- Implemented form validation and error handling for a smoother sign-up
process.
- Integrated analytics to track user actions during account claiming.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Smith <me@lucasjamessmith.me>
Co-authored-by: David Nguyen <davidngu28@gmail.com>
## Description
Fetch the updated version of the document after sealing it and return
it. Previously, the `document.documentData.data` wasn't up to date. Now
it is.
## Related Issue
Fixes#1088.
## Testing Performed
* Added console.logs in the code to make sure it returns the proper data
* Set up a webhook and tested that the webhook receives the updated data
## Checklist
<!--- Please check the boxes that apply to this pull request. -->
<!--- You can add or remove items as needed. -->
- [x] I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
- [ ] I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these
changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if
applicable.
- [x] I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
- [ ] I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous
submission, if applicable.
Return the recipient as an array to match the other formats for Zapier.
Otherwise, Zaps with the "DOCUMENT_OPENED" hooks won't work.
All the other webhooks return the "Recipient" field as an array.
Catalin Pit
